Global Manufacturing Partner
Material GuideAZ91D vs AM60B magnesium die casting

AZ91D vs AM60B -Magnesium Die Casting Alloy Selection Guide

AZ91D vs AM60B: static strength vs impact resistance and crash safety. Why AM60B's 8% elongation and 20 J impact strength make it mandatory for automotive safety-critical structures despite AZ91D's higher tensile strength.

2 min read
Last updated: 2026-04-08

Supporting Visuals

Production images for this page

These images are pulled from your current KastMfg asset library. Page-specific files automatically override shared fallback visuals when you add them later.

AZ91D vs AM60B -Magnesium Die Casting Alloy Selection Guide - Raw Alloy / Casting Sample
Page image

Raw Alloy / Casting Sample

Add a material sample, casting coupon, or alloy family photo to break up the technical content and anchor the page visually.

Best as a product-on-table shot

AZ91D vs AM60B -Magnesium Die Casting Alloy Selection Guide - Application Example
Page image

Application Example

Place a real end-use component photo that shows where this alloy performs well in production.

Best as an application component photo

AZ91D vs AM60B -Strength vs Crash Safety

AZ91D and AM60B are both 34% lighter than aluminum. Both provide inherent EMI shielding. But their mechanical properties diverge in ways that are decisive for specific applications -and choosing AZ91D for a safety-critical automotive structure is a functional safety failure.


The Composition Difference

Element AZ91D AM60B Effect
Aluminum (Al) 8.3-8.7% 5.5-6.5% Higher Al = more Mg17Al12 intermetallic -stronger but more brittle
Zinc (Zn) 0.35-1.0% 0.22% max Minor
Manganese (Mn) 0.15% min 0.24% min Minor
Impurities (Fe, Ni, Cu) Strictly controlled Strictly controlled Same corrosion protection

Properties

Property AZ91D AM60B Preferred
Tensile strength 230 MPa 220 MPa AZ91D +5%
Yield strength 160 MPa 130 MPa AZ91D +23%
Elongation 3% 8% AM60B +167%
Impact strength (Charpy) 4 J 20 J AM60B 5x higher
Fatigue strength 70 MPa 97 MPa AM60B +38%
Corrosion resistance Better (higher Al) Good AZ91D slightly better

Why the Impact Difference Is Not Just a Number

AZ91D fractures at 3% elongation. AM60B deforms to 8% before fracture. Under crash loading, this is the difference between controlled energy absorption and brittle fragmentation.

Automotive safety logic:

  • A steering wheel armature must deform progressively under head impact -absorbing energy, maintaining airbag geometry, not fracturing into sharp fragments
  • A seat frame must maintain occupant restraint through the crash pulse
  • An instrument panel beam must absorb energy without becoming a projectile

AZ91D's 4 J impact strength makes it unsuitable for these applications regardless of its higher static tensile strength. AM60B's 20 J and 8% elongation are what safety regulations require.

Euro NCAP, IIHS, and FMVSS crashworthiness testing has validated AM60B-based steering wheel armatures, seat frames, and IP crossbeams in production vehicles since the mid-1990s.


Decision Guide

Application AZ91D AM60B
Electronics chassis (laptop, tablet) Yes -
Camera and instrument bodies Yes -
Power tool housings Yes -
Automotive steering wheel armature - Yes
Automotive seat frame - Yes
Instrument panel cross-car beam - Yes
Non-safety automotive brackets Yes Yes
Telecom enclosures Yes -

Cost and Availability

AZ91D and AM60B are similarly priced -the difference in aluminum content is small enough that material cost premium is negligible (<2%). Both are available from major magnesium alloy suppliers globally. The choice is purely technical.


Magnesium alloy selection: yaoqingpu1983@gmail.com | +86 138 1403 4409

Related Resources

Continue the research path

Need a Quote for Your Project?

Our engineering team is ready to review your requirements and provide competitive pricing with fast turnaround.

Request a Quote