Case Study: Hydraulic Manifold -A413 Pressure-Tight at 350 Bar | KastMfg
How KastMfg produced A413 hydraulic manifold blocks passing 350 bar burst and helium leak tests -using VADC, mold flow simulation, and 100% production pressure testing. No impregnation.
Supporting Visuals
Production images for this page
These images are pulled from your current KastMfg asset library. Page-specific files automatically override shared fallback visuals when you add them later.

Finished Component Photo
Reserve one strong product image that shows the finished casting or machined component used in the case study.
Best as a hero component image

Process or Inspection Photo
Use a production, leak-test, machining, or inspection image that proves how the project was executed.
Best as an in-process factory photo
Case Study: Hydraulic Manifold Block -350 Bar, No Impregnation
Customer: Industrial hydraulic system integrator, Germany Program: Directional control manifold block for industrial press Annual volume: 12,000 pieces/year Material: A413 aluminum alloy Weight: 1.8 kg Requirement: 350 bar burst, 85 bar working pressure, helium leak <10^-6 mbar·L/s, no VPI impregnation
The Challenge
Previous source: sand casting, Germany. Sand casting gave adequate pressure tightness but poor dimensional consistency -3 setups required for SAE boss port machining. Customer specification prohibits VPI impregnation (long-term sealant compatibility concerns with hydraulic fluid).
The solution had to be: genuine cast-in pressure tightness at 85 bar working / 350 bar burst, with no impregnation.
Solution
Alloy: A413 (Near-Eutectic)
A413's 12% silicon produces the finest solidification microstructure of any standard die casting alloy. Shrinkage porosity significantly below A380. Accepted 8% strength reduction (290 vs 317 MPa tensile) in exchange for superior internal soundness.
Process: VADC
Cavity vacuum <25 mbar. Fill time: 95 ms at 38 m/s gate velocity. First-article X-ray: ASTM E505 Class 1 across all port face sections. Class 2 at one thick section -corrected with chilling insert on T1 modification.
Gate Placement via Mold Flow Simulation
Simulation confirmed gating at the port-face end minimized weld lines at SAE boss locations -the most pressure-critical sections. This gate position was non-obvious; the conventional choice would have placed the gate centrally.
Testing: 100% Pressure + 2% Helium Sample
- 100% nitrogen decay at 130 bar, 45s hold, <3 cm³/min limit
- 2% helium mass spectrometer sampling, <10^-6 mbar·L/s limit
Zero failures in first 8,000 production pieces. Burst qualification: 8 parts tested to destruction, all above 370 bar (minimum 350 bar).
Results vs Previous Sand Casting
| Metric | Sand casting | KastMfg A413 HPDC |
|---|---|---|
| Unit cost | Baseline | -8% |
| Port face flatness (as-cast) | 0.4-0.8 mm | 0.15-0.25 mm |
| Machining setups for ports | 3 | 1 |
| Production leak test pass rate | 96.2% | 100% (first 8,000 pcs) |
| Burst pressure (min of 8) | 380 bar | 371 bar |
| Production lead time | 8 weeks | 5 weeks |
Contact KastMfg: yaoqingpu1983@gmail.com | +86 138 1403 4409 | No.6, Rungu Road, Nanjing, China
Related Resources
Continue the research path
Case Study: Magnesium Laptop Chassis -40% Weight Reduction | KastMfg
How KastMfg produced AZ91D magnesium die cast laptop chassis achieving 40% weight reduction versus A380 aluminum, with Grade A cosmetic surface, passing drop test and paint adhesion requirements.
CapabilityQuality Control
Review inspection workflow, traceability support, and process control standards before launch.
Process GuideDie Casting Process
See how casting, trimming, machining, finishing, and inspection fit together in production.
Next StepRequest a Quote
Send your drawing package and target volume to get an engineering-backed quotation.
Need a Quote for Your Project?
Our engineering team is ready to review your requirements and provide competitive pricing with fast turnaround.
Request a Quote