Global Manufacturing Partner
Case Studypressure tight hydraulic manifold die casting

Case Study: Hydraulic Manifold -A413 Pressure-Tight at 350 Bar | KastMfg

How KastMfg produced A413 hydraulic manifold blocks passing 350 bar burst and helium leak tests -using VADC, mold flow simulation, and 100% production pressure testing. No impregnation.

2 min read
Last updated: 2026-04-08

Supporting Visuals

Production images for this page

These images are pulled from your current KastMfg asset library. Page-specific files automatically override shared fallback visuals when you add them later.

Case Study: Hydraulic Manifold -A413 Pressure-Tight at 350 Bar | KastMfg - Finished Component Photo
Page image

Finished Component Photo

Reserve one strong product image that shows the finished casting or machined component used in the case study.

Best as a hero component image

Case Study: Hydraulic Manifold -A413 Pressure-Tight at 350 Bar | KastMfg - Process or Inspection Photo
Page image

Process or Inspection Photo

Use a production, leak-test, machining, or inspection image that proves how the project was executed.

Best as an in-process factory photo

Case Study: Hydraulic Manifold Block -350 Bar, No Impregnation

Customer: Industrial hydraulic system integrator, Germany Program: Directional control manifold block for industrial press Annual volume: 12,000 pieces/year Material: A413 aluminum alloy Weight: 1.8 kg Requirement: 350 bar burst, 85 bar working pressure, helium leak <10^-6 mbar·L/s, no VPI impregnation


The Challenge

Previous source: sand casting, Germany. Sand casting gave adequate pressure tightness but poor dimensional consistency -3 setups required for SAE boss port machining. Customer specification prohibits VPI impregnation (long-term sealant compatibility concerns with hydraulic fluid).

The solution had to be: genuine cast-in pressure tightness at 85 bar working / 350 bar burst, with no impregnation.


Solution

Alloy: A413 (Near-Eutectic)

A413's 12% silicon produces the finest solidification microstructure of any standard die casting alloy. Shrinkage porosity significantly below A380. Accepted 8% strength reduction (290 vs 317 MPa tensile) in exchange for superior internal soundness.

Process: VADC

Cavity vacuum <25 mbar. Fill time: 95 ms at 38 m/s gate velocity. First-article X-ray: ASTM E505 Class 1 across all port face sections. Class 2 at one thick section -corrected with chilling insert on T1 modification.

Gate Placement via Mold Flow Simulation

Simulation confirmed gating at the port-face end minimized weld lines at SAE boss locations -the most pressure-critical sections. This gate position was non-obvious; the conventional choice would have placed the gate centrally.

Testing: 100% Pressure + 2% Helium Sample

  • 100% nitrogen decay at 130 bar, 45s hold, <3 cm³/min limit
  • 2% helium mass spectrometer sampling, <10^-6 mbar·L/s limit

Zero failures in first 8,000 production pieces. Burst qualification: 8 parts tested to destruction, all above 370 bar (minimum 350 bar).


Results vs Previous Sand Casting

Metric Sand casting KastMfg A413 HPDC
Unit cost Baseline -8%
Port face flatness (as-cast) 0.4-0.8 mm 0.15-0.25 mm
Machining setups for ports 3 1
Production leak test pass rate 96.2% 100% (first 8,000 pcs)
Burst pressure (min of 8) 380 bar 371 bar
Production lead time 8 weeks 5 weeks

Contact KastMfg: yaoqingpu1983@gmail.com | +86 138 1403 4409 | No.6, Rungu Road, Nanjing, China

Related Resources

Continue the research path

Need a Quote for Your Project?

Our engineering team is ready to review your requirements and provide competitive pricing with fast turnaround.

Request a Quote