Case Study: Supplier Switch Reduced Finished Part Cost
How KastMfg helped an industrial equipment buyer switch die casting suppliers, stabilize quality, and reduce finished component cost through tooling review and in-house machining.
Supporting Visuals
Project photos for die casting supplier switch cost reduction
These images are pulled from your current KastMfg asset library. Page-specific files automatically override shared fallback visuals when you add them later.

Finished Component Photo
Reserve one strong product image that shows the finished casting or machined component used in the case study.
Best as a hero component image

Process or Inspection Photo
Use a production, leak-test, machining, or inspection image that proves how the project was executed.
Best as an in-process factory photo
Customer: North American industrial equipment OEM Program: Aluminum gearbox cover and machined mounting plate Annual volume: 36,000 pieces/year Material: A380 aluminum Scope: Tool transfer, HPDC production, CNC machining, powder coating, export packaging
The Procurement Problem
The buyer had an incumbent supplier that could cast the part, but machining was subcontracted to a separate shop. This created three recurring problems:
- Dimensional disputes between the casting supplier and machining supplier
- Long correction loops when sealing faces or tapped holes failed inspection
- Rising finished-part cost after multiple freight and handling steps
The buyer wanted one supplier to own the complete finished component.
KastMfg's Review
KastMfg audited the transferred tooling, inspected the critical cavity areas, and compared the casting datum scheme against the machining drawing. The main finding was that the original casting had insufficient machining allowance on one sealing face, causing occasional cleanup failures.
KastMfg recommended:
- Minor tool correction to add stable machining allowance
- New CNC fixture referencing cast datum pads
- First article inspection focused on flatness, thread position, and sealing face cleanup
- Packaging change to protect coated surfaces during ocean shipment
Implementation
The transferred tool was qualified on a matching tonnage machine. KastMfg then ran a controlled first article batch, machined the parts in-house, and submitted dimensional reports with photos of the fixture and packaging method.
The buyer approved production after one correction loop.
Results
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Finished part cost | Reduced by 18% versus previous supply chain |
| Supplier count | Reduced from 3 suppliers to 1 |
| Machining rejection | Reduced after datum and allowance correction |
| Communication loop | One project engineer owned casting and machining |
| Shipment condition | Surface damage reduced after packaging change |
Why It Worked
The cost reduction did not come from casting price alone. It came from eliminating handoffs between casting, machining, finishing, and packaging. One accountable supplier could identify the process root cause and quote the finished component instead of a partial operation.
For similar projects, see die casting tool transfer and CNC machining for die casting parts.
Supplier switch inquiry: yaoqingpu1983@gmail.com | +86 138 1403 4409 | No.6, Rungu Road, Nanjing, China
Related Resources
Next steps for die casting supplier switch cost reduction
Case Study: Tool Transfer and Quality Recovery
How KastMfg onboarded transferred die casting tooling, corrected process instability, restored first article approval, and restarted production for an export buyer.
CapabilityQuality Control
Review inspection workflow, traceability support, and process control standards before launch.
Process GuideDie Casting Process
See how casting, trimming, machining, finishing, and inspection fit together in production.
Next StepRequest a Quote
Send your drawing package and target volume to get an engineering-backed quotation.
Need a Quote for Your Project?
Our engineering team is ready to review your requirements and provide competitive pricing with fast turnaround.
Request a Quote