Global Manufacturing Partner
Material GuideZamak 3 vs Zamak 5

Zamak 3 vs Zamak 5 -Choosing the Right Zinc Die Casting Alloy

Zamak 3 vs Zamak 5: tensile strength +17%, compressive yield +45%, creep resistance -versus higher ductility and lower cost. Decision framework for hardware, automotive, and decorative applications.

2 min read
Last updated: 2026-04-08

Supporting Visuals

Production images for this page

These images are pulled from your current KastMfg asset library. Page-specific files automatically override shared fallback visuals when you add them later.

Zamak 3 vs Zamak 5 -Choosing the Right Zinc Die Casting Alloy - Raw Alloy / Casting Sample
Page image

Raw Alloy / Casting Sample

Add a material sample, casting coupon, or alloy family photo to break up the technical content and anchor the page visually.

Best as a product-on-table shot

Zamak 3 vs Zamak 5 -Choosing the Right Zinc Die Casting Alloy - Application Example
Page image

Application Example

Place a real end-use component photo that shows where this alloy performs well in production.

Best as an application component photo

Zamak 3 vs Zamak 5 -The Definitive Comparison

Zamak 3 and Zamak 5 differ by exactly one element: copper. Zamak 3 has >=.10% copper; Zamak 5 has 0.75-1.25%. That single difference produces measurable but focused property changes.


Composition Difference

Element Zamak 3 Zamak 5 Impact
Aluminum (Al) 4.0% 4.0% Same
Copper (Cu) >=.10% 0.75-1.25% All property differences
Magnesium (Mg) 0.04% 0.04% Same
Zinc (Zn) Balance Balance Same

Properties

Property Zamak 3 Zamak 5 Preferred
Tensile strength 283 MPa 331 MPa +17%
Yield strength 200 MPa 228 MPa +14%
Elongation 10% 7% -0%
Hardness 82 HRB 91 HRB +11%
Compressive yield 414 MPa 600 MPa +45%
Impact strength 58 J 65 J +12%
Creep resistance Standard Better Measurable
Plating suitability Excellent Excellent Same
Die life Same Same Same
Cost Baseline +3-% Small

The Trade-Off in Plain Terms

Copper in Zamak 5 buys strength (+17% tensile, +45% compressive yield) at the cost of ductility (-0% elongation). For most applications, this favors Zamak 5 -the strength is valuable, the ductility reduction is inconsequential because zinc hardware is rarely designed to deform plastically in service.

For applications where ductility under assembly forces, snap-fit engagement, or drop impact is important, Zamak 3's higher elongation is the correct choice.


Creep -The Often-Overlooked Factor

Zinc alloys are susceptible to room-temperature creep (time-dependent deformation under sustained load). Zamak 5's copper reduces creep rate by 30-40% versus Zamak 3. This matters for:

  • Parts with press-fit components that must maintain engagement force over years
  • Loaded bearing surfaces where dimensional creep affects clearance
  • Threaded insert housings where clamping load must be maintained

Decision Framework

Application Zamak 3 Zamak 5
Decorative furniture hardware Yes Yes
Padlock body (forced entry load) - Yes
Snap-fit assembly (ductility) Yes -
European architectural hardware - Yes(ZnAl4Cu1 is EU default)
Automotive seat hardware - Yes
Maximum plating quality Yes Yes(same)
Threaded insert housing - Yes(creep resistance)
Max volume economy Yes -

North America: Zamak 3 is the default. Specify Zamak 5 when structural load, creep, or wear resistance is required.

Europe: Zamak 5 (ZnAl4Cu1 per EN 1774) is the default. Specify Zamak 3 only when maximum elongation or cost savings are the deciding factor.


Zinc alloy selection: yaoqingpu1983@gmail.com | +86 138 1403 4409

Related Resources

Continue the research path

Need a Quote for Your Project?

Our engineering team is ready to review your requirements and provide competitive pricing with fast turnaround.

Request a Quote