Global Manufacturing Partner
Material GuideADC12 vs A380 die casting

ADC12 vs A380 -Which Aluminum Die Casting Alloy to Specify

Direct comparison of ADC12 (JIS H5302) and A380 (ASTM B85): composition, mechanical properties, castability, and when each is the correct specification. Decision guide for engineers and buyers.

2 min read
Last updated: 2026-04-08

Supporting Visuals

Production images for this page

These images are pulled from your current KastMfg asset library. Page-specific files automatically override shared fallback visuals when you add them later.

ADC12 vs A380 -Which Aluminum Die Casting Alloy to Specify - Raw Alloy / Casting Sample
Page image

Raw Alloy / Casting Sample

Add a material sample, casting coupon, or alloy family photo to break up the technical content and anchor the page visually.

Best as a product-on-table shot

ADC12 vs A380 -Which Aluminum Die Casting Alloy to Specify - Application Example
Page image

Application Example

Place a real end-use component photo that shows where this alloy performs well in production.

Best as an application component photo

ADC12 vs A380 -The Practical Difference

ADC12 and A380 are commonly called "equivalent." The differences are real and matter in specific contexts. This comparison explains when each is the correct specification.


Side-by-Side

Parameter ADC12 (JIS H5302) A380 (ASTM B85)
Standard Japanese JIS American ASTM
Silicon 9.6-12.0% 7.5-8.5%
Copper 1.5-2.5% 3.0-4.0%
Tensile strength 310 MPa 317 MPa
Yield strength 160 MPa 159 MPa
Elongation 2.5% 3.5%
Hardness 85 HRB 80 HRB
Thermal conductivity 96 W/m·K 96 W/m·K
Castability Slightly better (higher Si) Excellent
Machinability Excellent Excellent
Corrosion resistance Similar Similar
Cost ±2% (similar) Baseline

The Silicon Difference

ADC12's higher silicon range (9.6-12.0% vs A380's 7.5-8.5%) provides:

  • Better fluidity: Higher silicon keeps the alloy fluid longer during injection -marginal benefit in complex thin-wall automotive castings
  • Slightly finer microstructure: More silicon particles per unit volume, marginally lower porosity tendency at equivalent process parameters
  • Slightly harder: 85 vs 80 HRB -meaningful for wear surfaces; irrelevant for most structural applications

The Copper Difference

A380's higher copper (3.0-4.0% vs ADC12's 1.5-2.5%) theoretically provides higher tensile strength -but the actual tensile difference is only 7 MPa (317 vs 310 MPa). Within production variation. Not a meaningful design factor for most applications.

The copper difference affects:

  • Corrosion resistance (bare metal): A380's higher copper slightly reduces bare-metal corrosion resistance. For coated parts, irrelevant.
  • Machinability: Both alloys are excellent -marginal improvement with A380.

Decision Guide

Specify ADC12 when:

  • Customer drawing or specification calls ADC12 or JIS H5302 by name
  • Program is in a Japanese, Korean, or Asian OEM supply chain requiring JIS certification
  • Japanese-format material certificates (Japanese-language material certificate are required

A380 is equally suitable when:

  • North American or European customer specifications
  • General industrial, commercial, and consumer applications
  • ASTM B85 certification is the standard format required

For most programs, ADC12 and A380 are interchangeable. The decision is driven by supply chain standard and documentation format, not technical performance.

KastMfg stocks both alloys and certifies to either standard.


Material selection consultation: yaoqingpu1983@gmail.com | +86 138 1403 4409

Related Resources

Continue the research path

Need a Quote for Your Project?

Our engineering team is ready to review your requirements and provide competitive pricing with fast turnaround.

Request a Quote