A413 vs A380 -When Pressure Tightness Justifies the Alloy Switch
A413 vs A380 die casting: when A413's near-eutectic composition and lower porosity justify replacing A380 for hydraulic manifolds, pneumatic valves, and thermal management applications.
Supporting Visuals
Production images for this page
These images are pulled from your current KastMfg asset library. Page-specific files automatically override shared fallback visuals when you add them later.

Raw Alloy / Casting Sample
Add a material sample, casting coupon, or alloy family photo to break up the technical content and anchor the page visually.
Best as a product-on-table shot

Application Example
Place a real end-use component photo that shows where this alloy performs well in production.
Best as an application component photo
A413 vs A380 -Pressure Tightness vs General Purpose
A380 is the general-purpose choice: best balance of strength, castability, machinability, and cost. A413 is the pressure-tight specialist: slightly weaker, slightly more expensive, but with significantly better internal soundness. Choose based on whether pressure tightness is a design requirement.
Comparison
| Parameter | A413 | A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Silicon | 11.0-13.0% (near-eutectic) | 7.5-8.5% |
| Copper | 1.0% max | 3.0-4.0% |
| Tensile strength | 290 MPa | 317 MPa |
| Yield strength | 145 MPa | 159 MPa |
| Thermal conductivity | 121 W/m·K | 96 W/m·K |
| Pressure tightness | Best -near-eutectic microstructure | Good |
| Porosity level (equivalent process) | Lower -finer solidification | Moderate |
| Machinability | Good | Excellent |
| Cost premium | ~3-% | Baseline |
Why A413 Has Lower Porosity
At A413's near-eutectic composition (12% Si, eutectic at 12.6%), solidification occurs with minimal dendrite formation -the microstructure is finer, shrinkage is lower, and inter-dendritic porosity channels are smaller and less interconnected. The result: reliably lower porosity per unit volume versus A380 in the same geometry and process conditions.
For a hydraulic manifold, the difference between Class 2 and Class 4 porosity (ASTM E505) can be the difference between passing and failing a 200 bar leak test.
When to Switch from A380 to A413
Switch to A413 when:
- Rated working pressure exceeds 80-100 bar and impregnation is not acceptable
- Helium leak test is required (<10^-5 mbar·L/s)
- Thermal conductivity is the design driver (121 vs 96 W/m·K -26% better)
- Internal soundness certification to ASTM E505 Class 1- is required
A380 is adequate when:
- No pressure tightness requirement
- Maximum tensile strength needed (A380: 317 vs A413: 290 MPa)
- Extensive CNC machining planned (A380 better machinability)
- General structural or enclosure application
The Cost Calculation
A413 costs ~3-% more per kg than A380. On a 1 kg casting at $3.00/kg material: $0.09-0.15/part premium. If this switch eliminates:
- Pressure test rework cycles: $1-/part
- VPI impregnation post-process: $1-/part
- Field leakage warranty returns: $20-100/part returned
The alloy switch pays for itself on the first quality event it prevents.
Hydraulic alloy selection: yaoqingpu1983@gmail.com | +86 138 1403 4409
Related Resources
Continue the research path
A413 Aluminum Alloy | Pressure-Tight Die Casting for Hydraulic & Pneumatic Parts | KastMfg
A413 near-eutectic aluminum alloy delivers the lowest porosity and best pressure tightness of any standard die casting alloy. Full composition, mechanical properties, and hydraulic application data from KastMfg.
CapabilityQuality Control
Review inspection workflow, traceability support, and process control standards before launch.
Process GuideDie Casting Process
See how casting, trimming, machining, finishing, and inspection fit together in production.
Next StepRequest a Quote
Send your drawing package and target volume to get an engineering-backed quotation.
Need a Quote for Your Project?
Our engineering team is ready to review your requirements and provide competitive pricing with fast turnaround.
Request a Quote