Global Manufacturing Partner
Process Guidedie casting leak testing

Leak Testing Die Castings -Air Decay, Helium & Pressure Methods | KastMfg

Complete guide to die casting leak testing: air decay, nitrogen, helium mass spectrometer, sensitivity comparison, test parameter specification, and how to write a pressure test requirement on your drawing.

3 min read
Last updated: 2026-04-08

Supporting Visuals

Production images for this page

These images are pulled from your current KastMfg asset library. Page-specific files automatically override shared fallback visuals when you add them later.

Leak Testing Die Castings -Air Decay, Helium & Pressure Methods | KastMfg - Factory or Process Image
Page image

Factory or Process Image

Reserve space for a production, tooling, or inspection photo that visually supports the main topic.

Best as a wide industrial image

Leak Testing Die Castings -Air Decay, Helium & Pressure Methods | KastMfg - Component Detail Image
Page image

Component Detail Image

Use a close-up of a casting, surface finish, machined feature, or application component to add visual proof.

Best as a detail or macro shot

Leak Testing Die Castings -Methods, Sensitivity, and Specification

Leak testing is production verification, not quality inspection. It does not improve part quality -it separates conforming parts (which will seal in service) from non-conforming parts (which will not) before they reach the customer.


Methods Compared

Method Medium Sensitivity Speed Cost Best Application
Air decay Dry compressed air ~1 cm³/min Fast (15-20 s) Low General pneumatic, low-pressure hydraulic
Nitrogen decay Dry nitrogen ~1 cm³/min Fast Low Hydraulic (cleanliness), coolant circuits
Hydrostatic Water Visible leak Moderate Low Burst pressure qualification
Helium tracer (hood) Helium <10^-8 mbar·L/s Moderate High Refrigerant, sealed electronics, precision
Hydrogen tracer H2/N2 mix ~10^-7 mbar·L/s Moderate Medium Alternative to helium

Air Decay -Production Standard

Air decay is the standard 100% production test for hydraulic and pneumatic die cast components. The part is pressurized to the test pressure, valved off, and monitored for pressure decay.

Test sequence:

  1. Part clamped in fixture with test ports sealed
  2. Pressurize to test pressure (typically 1.25-2.5x rated working pressure)
  3. Valve off and allow 3- s stabilization (thermal equilibration)
  4. Monitor pressure decay for hold time (15-20 s)
  5. Compare actual decay to limit -pass or fail

Key sensitivities:

  • Temperature variation of ±1°C changes air pressure by ~0.3% -temperature-stabilized test rooms or temperature compensation essential for tight limits
  • Part volume affects sensitivity -smaller part volume = more pressure drop for same leak rate = easier to detect small leaks

Typical acceptance criteria:

Application Test Pressure Hold Time Decay Limit
Pneumatic valve body (10 bar) 15 bar 30 s <0.5 cm³/min
Hydraulic manifold (100 bar) 150 bar 45 s <2 cm³/min
Cooling circuit (5 bar) 8 bar 30 s <0.3 cm³/min

Helium Mass Spectrometer Testing

Helium testing detects leak rates orders of magnitude smaller than air decay -down to 10^-8-10^-10 mbar·L/s. This sensitivity is necessary when:

  • The fluid being sealed is expensive (refrigerant)
  • Leakage creates regulatory or safety problems (oxygen systems, toxic gas)
  • Service life requires leak-free integrity over years (hermetically sealed electronics)
  • Standard air decay passes but field failures occur -indicating very small leak rates just below air decay detection

Hood (bomb) method: Part is pressurized internally with helium, placed inside a sealed chamber connected to the spectrometer. Accumulated helium concentration in the hood is measured after a dwell time. Best for production 100% testing of small to medium parts.

Sniffer probe method: Part is pressurized with helium; a probe is passed over external surfaces. Localizes the leak position. Best for qualification, troubleshooting, and root cause investigation.


How to Write a Pressure Test Specification

Vague specifications ("pressure tight," "no leaks") create supplier-customer disagreement. State the test method, medium, pressure, hold time, and acceptance criterion explicitly:

Good examples:

"100% air decay test. Test pressure: 150 bar. Stabilization: 5 s. Hold time: 45 s. Maximum decay: 2 cm³/min."

"100% helium leak test (hood method). Test pressure: 8 bar helium. Dwell time: 60 s. Maximum leak rate: 10^-6 mbar·L/s."

Common specification errors:

  • Specifying "1.5x working pressure" without stating the working pressure
  • Specifying decay rate without specifying part volume or test pressure
  • Specifying "helium leak test" without specifying sensitivity limit or test method

KastMfg Pressure Testing Capability

Equipment Range Sensitivity
Air decay test stations (4 units) Up to 200 bar <0.1 cm³/min
Nitrogen high-pressure station Up to 350 bar Pressure decay
Helium mass spectrometer (hood) Any pressure <10^-8 mbar·L/s

All test records archived: part serial number, test date, test pressure, hold time, actual decay or leak rate, pass/fail. Available to customers on request for 5 years minimum.


Relationship Between Alloy, VADC, and Test Performance

Alloy + Process Typical Air Decay (100 bar, A size part) Helium Leak Rate
A380 standard HPDC 70-75% pass rate 10^-4-10^-5 mbar·L/s typical
A413 standard HPDC 90-97% pass rate 10^-4-10^-5 mbar·L/s
A413 + VADC 99-100% pass rate <10^-6 mbar·L/s
A380 + VADC 98-100% pass rate <10^-6 mbar·L/s

Pressure test specification support: yaoqingpu1983@gmail.com | +86 138 1403 4409

Related Resources

Continue the research path

Need a Quote for Your Project?

Our engineering team is ready to review your requirements and provide competitive pricing with fast turnaround.

Request a Quote